
I think "what is art?" is a question that baffled many in the past, now and even Singaporeans.
Last year, I started researching on "the arts"... asking the value of the arts, questioning the existence of it, the purpose of it etc... which led me to reading, talking, discussing, thinking. Hmm... think I'm finally getting somewhere.
>> The Question
As with many of life's ambiguities, people in the past and present have plenty of philosophies / comments on life's questions. Some say that Art is only art if "the art world" says it is. Some say that Art is only art if the intentions of the artist reflects a certain view point. Some say that only some people can appreciate art and some cannot. Some say that Art is sacred and needs to be moral. Hahah... the list goes on. So what exactly is it?
I think I've found a rather satisfactory "definition" "A work of art is anythin that anyone has ever considered work of art, though it may be a work of art only for that one person."
In this statement, it challenges some thoughts:
1. Who is to say what is art and not? Is the "art world" obsolete now in our pluralistic society? In relativism? Yes, I respect history, I honor previous systems. Yet I also challenge them because every system is flawed and its relevance to the current times are essential.
2. Are all art good?
All art can be good or bad - depending on the value to which people tag to it. A piece of art may speak to someone, but not to another. This erases defensivenes... esp with the egos of the people... The masses vs elite thing. Some 'art' can only be appreciated by 'the higher society'. Does liking something that 90% of the people dislike make one "higher" or "better"? Does being able to grasp the abstract make someone "superior"? What is wrong if one enjoys what most people enjoy? Hmm... need to think through this a bit more...
3. What is the value of art?
I think this is a typical Singaporean question. Overheard a typical conversation of 3 students at Kinokuniya... where 2 of them were sharing with another friend about their interest in art history and pointing out who their favourite artists were. Then the student asked them back "Huh? I thought you all are NUS students ah. Why need to know all this?" And the answer the 2 art lovers gave were "It is interesting!".
Was really amused by this conversation. Grin. So typical Singaporean - where the arts do not make money... therefore it is of "no value" to the society. Everything, every action, every sowing, every minute of studying, working, is to plough for the Singaporean dream - earn a lot of money so one does not need to be a road sweeper and hopefully get the 5 Cs.
Hmm... LOL. Yeah... people may think that I'm bohemian. But I'm actually very Singaporean - understanding the practicalities of life. BUT I am learning to trade a part of the Singaporean dream for my dreams, my enjoyment and the pleasures that come forth from exploring the arts. Its fun. Yeah... not all things in life can make money... and not all things in life also equate to money.
Understand that many in Singapore struggle to make ends meet... but many who have the means also push themselves for a 'better' life. Just as the definition of art... we all choose to define our lifes ourselves and pay the price and consequence for it. =)